Governance
78
Document
assessment
Every score, its evidence.
Themiros reads your documents, scores every pillar and opens the excerpt behind the number. Assessment stops being an opinion.
Policies and NDCs Programmes Projects FR / EN
Built for the people who have to justify a decision
Funders and financiers/
Ministries/
NGOs and operators/
Evaluation consultancies/
Impact funds/
Public banks/
How it works
Four steps.
You upload, the tool sorts, analyses and returns a readable result.
Workspace
You state the country, the type of intervention and the funder. The tool proposes the pillars to assess. You approve them.
Upload
You load your documents. Each one gets a verdict: compliant, to review, or out of scope.
Analyse
The tool checks it has enough material, then computes the scores pillar by pillar.
Read
You get a summary, alerts and an action plan. Everything is clickable down to the source.
Three readings
Facts on one side, judgement on the other.
Most assessments blend the two. Themiros separates them, then compares.
What is measurable
What is observable in the documents: figures, commitments, mechanisms. Computed by visible rules.
What is a matter of judgement
Appraisal against recognised frameworks (OECD/DAC, sector standards, funder criteria). Bounded, never free-form.
The gap between the two
When judgement drifts from the facts, the gap is flagged. That is often where the real issue sits.
What it does
Useful, not decorative.
Every score has its evidence
One click opens the excerpt, the page and the source document.
Sorting happens upstream
An out-of-scope document never enters the calculation.
Confidence is on display
It comes from how many documents converge, not from one isolated sentence.
The tool knows how to say no
Without enough documents it shows “to document” rather than an invented score.
Every language
No document is set aside because of the language it is written in.
Audit log and export
Every calculation is traced. Export to PDF, Word or JSON.
Who it is for
One reading per role.
The same file, presented according to what you need to do with it.
Decision-makers
A short summary: what is progressing, what is stuck, what still needs checking before you decide.
Implementation teams
The detail per pillar and an action plan tied to field evidence.
Analysts and evaluators
The sub-questions, the evidence register, the audit log and the full export.
Our rules
What the tool will never do.
A score you cannot defend in front of a funder is worth nothing.
No text
without evidence. Every sentence produced cites its source.
No opaque
overall grade. Detail outranks the single number.
No forced
conclusion. Without material, the tool says so.
No hidden
rule. The weightings are visible and verifiable.
No silent
deletion. The log keeps a trace of everything.
No decision
without you. Final approval stays human.
Let us run it on your documents.
A 30-minute demo on a real case. You will see the scores, the evidence, and the limits.